Showing posts with label Christian against Christian. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Christian against Christian. Show all posts

Wednesday, 20 May 2015

LIES, LIES AND MORE LIES

Lies, Atheism and the Pro-Abortion Movement
Not all atheists are pro-abortion and not all in the pro-choice movement are atheists, but I have come to the conclusion that most are.  What drew me to this conclusion?  Let me explain…
In my position as president of Bus Stop Bible Studies I have had the opportunity to work with a number of crisis pregnancy centres, posting advertising panels inside buses with various Canadian transit companies to promote their compassionate ministries.  We first posted panels with the North York Pregnancy Care Centre (now Pregnancy Care Centre) back in 2010.  In the past five years there has been the occasional complaint but nothing of any consequence.  In that same time the number of PCC locations in the GTA has increased to six, such is the demand for their services.
In mid-May, 2015 a certain Linda Star started an on-line petition in an attempt to get the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) to remove the current PCC advertising panels. "Remove anti-choice ads on the TTC" reads the petition headline. What I found so amazing, and so disturbing, is that one individual can post a petition, the basis for which are lies and fabrication, and get 15,000 signatures in a matter of days.  I guess this is one of the downsides of the social-media world in which we now live.
Below is the specific advertising panel used as the basis for the petition:
As I reviewed the written comments on the petition website I noted a number of recurring themes, so I copied and pasted a completely random selection of 1,090 comments into a spreadsheet and conducted some simple analysis based on key words.
Here are some conclusions I was able to draw:
The Pro-Choice community are not interested in choice - they are almost exclusively interested in access to abortion.  Even though the co-sponsor of the bus ads is the JFJ Hope Centre adoption agency, apparently this is not a viable ‘choice’ for the pro-aborts.  Of the 1,090 comments analyzed there were 18 references to adoption – all of them conveyed negatively:
“We don't need Ads promoting Adoption on the TTC.”
“I think more woman should have abortions to help control the population. There are way to [sic] many people on this planet and I think if someone wants a kid they should adopt.”
“Pregnancy Care Centres are guilty of false advertising. They purport to provide information about options, but they only provide information about placing a baby for adoption, or raising it on your own. They do not provide information about the possibility of termination.”
The pro-abortionists are anti-religion or seemingly deny a moral compass.  Of the 1,090 comments there were 164 direct references to religion, again all in the negative.  100% of the comments deny or exclude that the life of the child has any bearing on the conversation – all that matters is the woman’s right (choice) to kill her unborn child.  The word choice was referenced to 412 times.
Reduced to an absolute, abortion is either moral or immoral.  It is either right or wrong. Why would I suggest that the choice of abortion is a moral absolute? Simply put, the outcome of an abortion is an absolute – a dead human (there is no other specie it could be).  One can argue the semantics of whether one calls this other living entity a child, a baby, a fetus or a zygote, but every living being has its origins at the moment of conception.
This bring us to question the definition and purpose of morality.  One dictionary definition of morality is “Principles concerning the distinction between right and wrong or good and bad behavior. A particular system of values and principles of conduct, especially one held by a specified person or society. The extent to which an action is right or wrong.”
Comment left on petition: “a mythical god should not be used to influence the right of personal choice.”
There are three possibilities with regard to (an individual’s) morality:
It’s personal.  My definition of what is right and wrong are the attributes that determine what I consider to be moral or immoral.  The only logical conclusion is anarchy – anything goes.  My sense of right and wrong is as valid as any other individual's and therefore I am accountable to no one.
It’s societal.  A simple majority of 50 + 1 establishes the rules.  As goes the crowd goes (even when led by an articulate but deceptive ideologue such as the likes of Hitler and any number of the current political leaders) so goes right and wrong.  Unfortunately the silent (moral?) majority remains silent and the noisy few establish the rules.
It’s an absolute.  If morality is an absolute then there must be a Moral Law Giver.  This Moral Law is that which distinguishes those that are pro-life and those that are pro-death.  And let me be very clear, to be pro-choice is to be pro-death because the only ‘choice’ that is in question is death.
This brings us back to the reasoning for my drawing the conclusion that most pro-death/choice individuals are atheist, it is simply because they deny the reality of any moral absolutes.  Moral absolutes are completely contradictory to their whole worldview and belief systems.
Ignorance.  The other conclusion I have come to is that most pro-choice supporters are woefully and tragically ignorant of the facts and what an abortion entails.  In the United States (and one would assume that Canadian statistics are comparative) 36% of abortions are carried out when the baby is 9-weeks or older and requires the killing and dismemberment of the baby by one means or another.
Lies. It has been said the abortion industry could not exist were it not for lies.
“A friend of mine was intentionally lied to at one of these "Crisis Pregnancy Centres" when she was a vulnerable, scared teen-ager seeking information and options when faced with an unplanned pregnancy. These ads, and the well-funded deceptive organizations behind them, must be exposed, and stopped. All women have the right to make health decisions based on their own personal, moral, religious, and material circumstances - and have equal access to unbiased, honest information and services. Support "Options for Sexual Health"!
This is the typical rhetoric from the pro-death/choice camp.  Obviously, the most glaring lie is that PCC’s don’t present choices – this is exactly what they do – and they will encourage their clients to make ‘right choices’.
As for being ‘well-funded…organizations’… all abortions in Canada are 100% government funded.  Abortion clinics are for the most part very profitable companies pulling in an average of $2-million per year each.  
Pregnancy Care Centres on the other hand are all not-for-profit, charitable organizations mostly run and supported by volunteers. Being ‘well-funded’ is as far from the truth as one can imagine.  One can view their financial statements of the Government CRA website.
“I find this false advertising offensive!” Of course, if this were false advertising one wouldn’t be allowed to post it on Canada’s transit systems. Typically it is statements such as these that are so patently false.
Below are the key words analyzed:
CHOICE/CHOICES
412
WOMEN
384
(ACCURATE) INFORMATION/INFORMED
353
ABORTION
178
DECIDE/DECISION
170
RELIGION/RELIGIOUS
164
FALSE
99
PROPAGANDA
96
(WOMAN'S) BODY
79
LAW/LEGAL
66
MISLEADING
55
ANTI-CHOICE
53
RIGHTS
39
PRO-CHOICE
23
GOD
17
LIES
16
MORAL/MORALITY
12
ANGRY
8
BIBLE
3

A Selection of comments posted on the petition:

"a public institution, in this case the TTC, should not be supporting a specific political viewpoint."

"A publicly owned corporation like the TTC can not be allowed to propagate religiously inspired mis-information."

"A safe abortion is a woman's right in Canada and I oppose any organization that impedes a woman's right to correct information and free choice. Please remove the offending adds."

"A woman needs factual and unbiased opinion when facing such an important decision; this is NOT a religious issue, but a health issue. This organization's position is the remove the constitutional right of 
women to make a well-informed decision."

"A woman's body is her own! SHE will decide what to do NOT anyone else!!"

"Abortion is a sin, but denial of choice is a greater, more venial sin!! If there was no sin in the world it would already be paradise."

"Abortion is a legal medical procedure and a basic human right for women and the shaming of women choosing this option HAS TO STOP."

"Advertising for places that lie to the public should not be allowed in Canada."

"Anti-choice ads oppose public health policy and seriously endanger women's psychological and physical health. It is scandalous that a public service like TTC would publicize such anti-health and anti-women advertisements. TTC must remove the advertisements immediately. Maybe TTC should also apologize to women and to public health authorities."

"Anything using religion as a weapon or providing incorrect information to force people into life choices, shouldn't be allowed."

"As a Christian I am very opposed to the anti-choice groups presenting themselves as "the" Christian choice. It is not."

"As a physician, I've long wanted these ads gone, and am glad to sign this. The centres advertise that they're there to "provide options," but they're not - instead, they present the option *they* think you should take, which is completely inappropriate. Currently, women in Canada are *technically* entitled to "safe and affordable" abortions, however, in reality, that doesn't happen - the wait-times in Kingston are ridiculous, such that I've had to send patients to Toronto; we can't even get a timely ultrasound to know if they're far enough along to terminate. On top of that, any woman who's been unlucky enough to have to face an unwanted pregnancy, and who has chosen to terminate, will probably agree with me that abortions in Canada are done without adequate analgesia - in the US, you have to pay for your abortion, but at least you have the option of anaesthetic. In Canada, you get given a token amount of medication, and contrary to what abortion clinic websites say, women do *not* describe the procedure as "uncomfortable," but rather as "very painful," and I base this on having worked at a Toronto clinic for 3 years. A bit off-topic, but worth adding! By all means, make your own choice, should you become pregnant, but just as God doesn't belong in the bedroom, neither does he belong in the doctor's office. Signed!"

"as a woman, i have the choice to act on my own body. brainwashing is unacceptable"

"Because choice is paramount."




Monday, 6 October 2014

Seeking Justice for God’s People – a Biblical Perspective


“For I, the LORD, love justice.  I hate robbery and wrongdoing.” Isaiah 61:8 NLT
The following narrative’s origin, while birthed out of an actual dispute amongst Christians and Christian organizations, does not pertain to any specific situation.  Rather, I have endeavoured to take a fresh, Biblical look at what Christians should do when Christian to Christian negotiations fail and justice has not been served.  The fundamental question being addressed here is, “Should Christians take other Christians to court; specifically secular courts?”
As you read through these thoughts please do so with your Bible at hand.  
While grappling with this issue I have had to contend with supposedly Bible-based and/or church traditions, and with serious questions such as “How can God possibly be glorified through this?”  Seeing as it is the most important, I will try and answer the last question first.  
I have struggled through many sleepless nights trying to discern whether actions being taken are appropriate.  Yet, it was when I was challenged by this most fundamental question of all, “How can God be glorified through this situation?”, that I realized the course of action decided upon could and hopefully will bring glory to God.
I have become convinced that God can be glorified through difficult and sometimes controversial situations by:

  1. Being obedient to God’s leading as we discern it through His Word, prayer, the Holy Spirit, affirming circumstance and His people (none being acted upon in isolation of others).
  2. How we conduct ourselves in any specific matter.  Holding one’s head high (as in trusting God), not falling into the trap of spreading rumours, exaggeration or speaking untruths, etc.
  3. Opposing and exposing evil.
  4. Seeking justice, especially for the orphan and widow.  
  5. Carefully and faithfully upholding what we learn in Scripture and applying it in context.
  6. Not becoming judgemental.  God is the judge and will have the final say in any given situation. 
  7. Trusting God to defend one’s cause when others falsely accuse or spread lies, rumours and innuendos.
  8. Praising God and giving Him glory regardless of any specific outcome.

I further believe that when a Christian(s) finds him or herself in an adversarial situation he or she can wave the banner of godliness and be an encouragement and example to those who have likewise been oppressed and/or wrongfully treated by others within the body of Christ.    The more I have meditated on these matters the more I have become convinced that those who are unjustly treated need to be defended in the presence of God and man.  It is a serious relinquishing of Biblically ordained responsibilities by Church leaders who fail to seek and uphold justice.  God did not call us to be dish rags – simply wrung out and thrown away.  No!  God Himself is the greatest proponent of justice – Jesus sacrifice is absolute evidence of that.  Peacemaking [Matthew 5:9] should not be confused with seeking justice [Isaiah 1:17].   The difference is often overlooked to the detriment of the church.

This brings us to the second major topic, contending with traditions.
Two key passages of Scripture are repeatedly quoted in situations where there is conflict within the body of Christ; Matthew 18:15-17 and 1 Corinthians 6:1-7.  In both instances as I have read and re-read these passages in context a whole new understanding has been realized. The importance of having a Berean attitude is of paramount importance. Verses or passages of Scripture read and quoted in isolation and out of context can establish dangerous precedents not supported elsewhere in Scripture.
The narrative in Matthew 18 actually starts off with disciples asking Jesus who will be the greatest in the Kingdom of Heaven and ends with Jesus telling Peter the parable of the unmerciful servant; the issue of ‘if a brother sins against you’ is placed in the middle of this extensive narrative.  Having reflected on my personal experiences, I found myself more and more identifying with the servants in verse 31, “So when his fellow servants saw what had been done, they were very grieved, and came and told their master all that had been done.”  In 1 Corinthians Paul chastises the church for their gross behaviour including sexual immorality, etc.  One of the offences that grieved Paul was taking their brothers to court over ‘trivial matters’ (6:2).  The words ‘trivial matters’ must not be overlooked and be used as an argument against taking appropriate action in the secular judicial system when matters of a serious legal or criminal nature arise.
Paul appealed more than once to the legal system, exercising his right to defend himself under Roman law (Acts 16:37–40; 18:12–17; 22:15–29; 25:10–22). In Romans 13 Paul taught that God had established legal authorities for the very purposes of upholding justice, punishing wrongdoers, and protecting the innocent.
The following are just a selected few of the hundreds of passages of Scripture concerning God’s perspective on seeking, applying and upholding justice:
The significance of justice
Isaiah 9:7 "Of the increase of His government and peace there will be no end, upon the throne of David and over His kingdom, to order it and establish it with judgment and justice from that time forward, even forever. The zeal of the Lord of hosts will perform this." 
Psalm 89:13 "Righteousness and justice are the foundation of Your throne; mercy and truth go before Your face."
Proverbs 1:2-5 "To know wisdom and instruction, to perceive the words of understanding, to receive the instruction of wisdom, justice, judgment, and equity; to give prudence to the simple, to the young man knowledge and discretion— a wise man will hear and increase learning, and a man of understanding will attain wise counsel,..."
Seeking justice
You will note that there are thirteen imperatives in the following two passages.
Isaiah 1:16-17 Wash yourselves, make yourselves clean; put away the evil of your doings from before My eyes.   Cease to do evil, learn to do good; seek justice, rebuke the oppressor; defend the fatherless, plead for the widow."
Psalm 82:2-4 "How long will you judge unjustly, and show partiality to the wicked?  Selah.  Defend the poor and fatherless; do justice to the afflicted and needy.  Deliver the poor and needy; free them from the hand of the wicked."
Applying justice
Deuteronomy 16:18 “You shall appoint judges and officers in all your gates, which the LORD your God gives you, according to your tribes, and they shall judge the people with just judgment."
See also Romans 13: 1-7 below.
Upholding justice
Deuteronomy 27:19 ‘Cursed is the one who perverts the justice due the stranger, the fatherless, and widow.’ [One can ‘pervert justice’ by simply failing to provide it.]
2 Samuel 8:15 So David reigned over all Israel; and David administered judgment and justice to all his people.
Psalm 10:17-18 LORD, You have heard the desire of the humble; you will prepare their heart; you will cause your ear to hear, to do justice to the fatherless and the oppressed, that the man of the earth may oppress no more.
Isaiah 56:1 Thus says the LORD: “Keep justice, and do righteousness, for My salvation is about to come, And My righteousness to be revealed.”
The Neglect of justice
Isaiah 1:21-22 How the faithful city has become a harlot! It was full of justice; righteousness lodged in it, but now murderers. Your silver has become dross, your wine mixed with water.
The secular judicial system has been established by God
Romans 13: 1-7 Let every soul be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and the authorities that exist are appointed by God. Therefore whoever resists the authority resists the ordinance of God, and those who resist will bring judgment on themselves. For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to evil. Do you want to be unafraid of the authority? Do what is good, and you will have praise from the same. For he is God’s minister to you for good. But if you do evil, be afraid; for he does not bear the sword in vain; for he is God’s minister, an avenger to execute wrath on him who practices evil. Therefore you must be subject, not only because of wrath but also for conscience’ sake.  For because of this you also pay taxes, for they are God’s ministers attending continually to this very thing. Render therefore to all their due: taxes to whom taxes are due, customs to whom customs, fear to whom fear, honour to whom honour.
This viewpoint is further reinforced in 1 Peter 2:13, “Submit yourselves for the Lord’s sake to every authority instituted among men: whether to the king who has supreme authority, or the governors, who are sent by him to punish those who do wrong...”
Conclusion
As one considers a choice and course of action in a dispute or confronting an adversary, one should ensure that prudent steps have been taken:
  • Endeavour to find a ‘peaceful’ solution.  Matthew 5:9
  • Seek the counsel of the wise and godly.  Proverbs 9:9
  • Study the Scriptures so that you can be confident in your actions. Acts 17:11
  • Present your petition to God.  Philippians 4:6
  • Seek professional [legal] counsel so that you can act knowledgably and wisely. Proverbs 4:7
  • Be prepared to submit your case to a tribunal of godly Christians and accept their judgement.  1 Corinthians 6:4
Having endeavoured to follow through on each of these steps, the right action may be to plead your case before the judicial courts so that your case may be determined by those who are skilled and knowledgeable in law to make a right judgement.
Even though you may be willing to abide by the aforementioned principles one cannot necessarily force one’s adversary to do so and, though you may feel uneasy about doing so, to neglect the seeking of justice cannot be biblically justified.
Evil men do not understand justice, but those who seek the LORD understand it fully. Proverbs 28:5.

David Harrison © 2010